The test of materiality was defined as whether "a reasonable person in the patient's position would be likely . However, interestingly in this case, Lord Scarman dissented promulgating that Bolam should not apply to issues of informed consent as the practitioner ought to owe a duty to convey any inherent or material risks posed to the patient. The case Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) 1 WLR 583 established that if a doctor acts in accordance with a responsible body of medical . Bolam test. Its important to be aware that not all harm suffered in medical procedures is caused by the doctors negligence. If the patient asked they said that there was a slight risk. Legal standard of care: a shift from the traditional Bolam test. Medicine is inherently an arduous and technically convoluted discipline that requires a special degree of expertise and dexterity; skills that are not necessarily colloquial within the general public. Then, it will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the test using relevant cases. Every healthcare professional owes their patients the correct standard of care. Where both kidneys have been seriously and permanently damaged or lost. Therefore, a doctors actions are examined against the standard of other reasonably competent doctors in that specific field. This sector in medical law recognises the importance of autonomy over paternalism; however, this area can potentially become troublesome once an element of late pregnancies is adjoined[26]. Thereupon, the patient suffered inexorable damage to the pelvis area induced by the ECT. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. You may be wondering how much compensation you could claim in damages for the harm you have suffered. To determine the reasonable standard of care, reference would be made to national guidelines, such as those published by professional bodies and NICE, academic textbooks and employers' policies and protocols. Bolam test. As it was, Kerr J felt bound by the law as it currently stands and thus he considered that his approach to the case had to be by reference to a possible invocation of the Bolitho exception (which unsurprisingly was invoked). A penetrating injury that has caused some permanent damage but where some normal function will return. 2010 Jun;71(6):331-4. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2010.71.6.48444. You should not treat any information in this essay as being authoritative. . During the procedure Mr Bolam violently convulsed and flailed about violently and dangerously, injuring himself in several different places before the procedure was stopped - including a fracture in his hip. Certainly, this test does not create a disproportionate criterion against which doctors are judged; merely the standard of an average doctor is engaged. The extent of your injuries will be considered, including how severe they are and how badly they have impacted your quality of life. They argued that in cases of pure diagnosis, there is limited scope for a difference in opinion. In such cases, there is no need to apply the Bolam test. A key characteristic in this case was the fact that expert testimony regarding a medical analysis of the actions of the doctor differed specifically on the employment of drug relaxants. administered incorrectly or the wrong dosage given, Cost of care for yourself or for someone else dependant on you, Additional medical care such as physiotherapy or counselling, Receipts for care costs or additional medical care, Invoices for any services youve required, An advisor can contact you at your chosen time, just fill out the. Furthermore, Braziers findings suggest that the principle of beneficence, not autonomy, promotes a middle ground in battles against medical paternalism. What are the advantages and disadvantages of automation testing? The Human Rights Act 1998 gave individuals in the UK recognised autonomy over their own bodies. The Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] WLR 582 is a case between a patient and mental health facility. Lord Kerr and Lord Reed delivered the lead judgment during the course of which their Lordships recognised [82]: a fundamental distinction between, on the one hand, the doctors role when considering possible investigatory or treatment options and, on the other, her role in discussing with the patient any recommended treatment and possible alternatives, and the risks of injury which may be involved.. They look at a case and confirm whether the level of care administered was of an acceptable standard. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). The much esteemed Bolitho, prima facie, heralds a new dawn[7]of a shift in credo from an anachronous partisanship to a more equitable character; this paper will inspect such allegations, determining whether the Bolam test is now an outdated relic of a more paternalistic past or has survived into the 21st Century. In particular, the Muller v Kings College Hospital NHS Trust [2017] QB 987 case. See the General Medical Council for more information on their involvement in doctors duty of care. Prior to these comments, in Salmonds Law of Torts, it was claimed that negligence alludes to an ethical concept as general practice itself may not be on equal terms with the standard of care required of a reasonably prudent man[43]. In accordance with the General Medical Council (GMC), doctors are required to provide the correct standard of care to all of their patients. Moreover, Brazier has recently[28]advocated for patients to assume responsibility as quickly as they are to invoke their rights. In O'Hare and another v Coutts & Co, the High Court moved away from the "Bolam" test for professional negligence claims (by reference to what a responsible body of professionals would do), at least in respect of financial advisers alerting their clients to investment risks.Does this suggest a change is coming in assessing negligence claims against construction professionals? Montgomery sued for negligence on the grounds that she hadnt been informed of the risk that this complication posed when giving birth vaginally, despite the fact that she asked if her babys size could have posed a problem. These notions underpin the clinical framework and hence each clinician should aspire to achieve these aims. PMC View examples of our professional work here. Hence as Illich attests, an individuals wellbeing is akin to the degree of lived freedom[14]. One of our advisors could offer you a free, no-obligation valuation of your claim. Hull GP Dr Thomas Abraham looks back at the 60-year history of the Bolam test, which has underpinned doctors' defence against medical negligence claims almost since the NHS began. The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). A test that arose from English tort law, which is used to assess medical negligence. How Does The Bolam Test Case Apply To Instances Of Negligence? It considers the treatment provided (not the outcome) and is sufficiently flexible to take account of the fact that medical treatment is rarely black and white. He suggested a distinction between freedom (particular acts) and autonomy which is more pervasive and alluding to states of an individual[16]. The .gov means its official. Consequently an erratic ambience is created, nurturing a confrontation between both doctor and patient. Copyright 2003 - 2023 - LawTeacher is a trading name of Business Bliss Consultants FZE, a company registered in United Arab Emirates. Moreover, completely neglecting a patients desires could potentially blur the distinction between beneficence and malfeasance. If this is something you want to discuss further, our team can assess your claim to see whether its valid. Nonetheless, upon dissecting the case it is evident that whilst their Lordships were cognisant of patient autonomy in the face of a growing paternalistic approach, there appeared to be a clear hesitance to put a halt to this apparent erosion of patient trust. She cites Kay Js proclamation that it would be a matter of great regret if patient rights were to usurp the medical empire, thus overlooking other ethical values and institutional integrity[29]. The patient in this case displayed the symptoms of Tuberculosis, but the doctors could not rule out several other illnesses. Moreover, the Bolam test implies a high threshold for potential claimants, thus thwarting superfluous claims and to some extent relieving the ill equipped NHS of any unnecessary anxieties. For instance, you may go to the hospital with a badly crushed and broken arm. Theyll then provide a medical report that details the extent of the harm youve suffered, which will be used to help value your claim. Diagnosis lies at the heart of the medical encounter, yet it has received much less attention than treatment. Would you like email updates of new search results? This case involved a woman who was offered surgery for back and neck pain. In Bolam, the Claimant sustained fractures of the acetabula during a course of electro-convulsive therapy administered to him at the Defendants mental hospital. This friction is accentuated in negligence claims when failure to consider the wishes of the autonomous patient results in volatile environment. Hence, it seemed that Donaldson MRs declaration at the Court of Appeal stage that the law will not allow the medical profession to play God[47], would be ignored once again and the Bolam test would be perpetuated. For many years we have acted in cases across the spectrum of clinical negligence litigation, ranging from smaller claims arising from dental treatment and minor cosmetic surgery to the most serious cases of birth and catastrophic injury and fatality. Bolam insists upon a negligence test that is unique only to the medical profession, as the standard of care is set by other doctors[39]. Specifically, the second limb of the test warrants that the detriment endured has a causal link to the negligent act. The panel is made up of healthcare providers who are trained in a similar field and who have knowledge on the appropriate standard of care required. Visit NHS Resolution to see the role they play in claims made against the NHS. Prima facie, the Bolitho judgment implies that patient interests are not being neglected as it was affirmed that medical specialists cannot be free to adjudicate on their own matters. McNair J defined what is meant by negligence in relation to situations where specific expertises are required, differentiating this scenario to the test of the man on top of a Clapham omnibus[33]. According to the GMC, this includes: If you would like to know more about the responsibilities that a healthcare provider owes to you, why not speak to a member of our team today? Apparent difference between 'Bolam' and 'Montgomery' The 'Bolam' principle has long been the traditional test governing how much information is necessary to avoid liability in negligence.The principle is that 'A doctor is not guilty of negligence if he has acted in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men skilled in that particular art . The negligence in the conduct of an act shall always be gauged against what ought to be taken . Akin to the court affairs in Bolam, there was a schism between the medical judgments as one body of medical opinion endorsed the defendants view whilst another body disapproved of the conduct. The unconvincing effects of this ruling simply connote that if medical judgment is provided, and as long as the actions of the doctor were in accordance with an accepted practice, negligence has not occurred. Additionally, medical negligence claims can often be complex. Bolam has been rejected in duty to warn cases and qualified in cases involving diagnosis and treatment. As a result of sustained increase in the level of instructions being received, opportunities now exist for established practitioners to join our cohesive and highly successful set of chambers. words, the Bolam test states that, "If a doctor reaches the standard of a responsible body of medical opinion, he is not negligent". Nonetheless, set against the backdrop of Hippocrates 5th Century clinical pledge, paternalism is also heavily rooted in the consequentialist moral theory of utilitarianism[9]. This realistic and impartial argument recognises that ultimately, both the doctor and the patient seek the customary target of rejuvenating the individual. She underwent the procedure and suffered paralysis. In order to prove liability in Negligence, the claimant must show on the balance of probabilities that: the defendant owed a duty of care, breached that duty by failing to meet the standard of care required and as a result the claimant suffered loss or damage which is not too remote. In Muller v Kings College Hospital NHS Trust[2017] QB 987 these are recognised as 'pure diagnosis' cases. Bolam received grave criticism from academics, therefore subsequent case law is important to analyse in order to ascertain whether precedent was perpetuated or replaced. Cases of medical negligence involve a doctor directly causing you harm or your condition to worsen. In the next section, we will look in greater detail at the role played by informed consent in medical negligence cases that use the Bolam test. It is apparent that a strict application of Bolam is not appropriate in all medical negligence cases. Under a No Win No Fee agreement, you wont be asked to pay solicitor fees in the event that your claim is unsuccessful. She apparently belonged to a school of thought which would not have resorted to the only procedure-itself Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! The highly dubious and academically contested area of the Bolam case lies in the reasoning applied to the second limb of the test. Of course, in medical scenes where the patient is mentally incapable of adopting a best interest decision befitting the situation, paternalism can suddenly appear alluring. Leg Med (Tokyo). United Kingdom, Clinical Negligence Cases: When the Bolam Test Does Not Apply, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee, Muller v Kings College Hospital NHS Trust, Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority, FB v Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Diagnosis and Management of Strokes in Emergency and Primary Care Settings, The Applicable Standard of Care in Cases Involving Medical Negligence Abroad. Muller v King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWHC 128 (QB) Background. NG1 5EF Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Lastly, it will conclude by . Bolam had not been restrained during the procedure. That's because, as well as breach of duty, you must prove causation. Indicative of a paternalistic demeanour, Bolam, prima facie appears to have shackled and bound the judiciary from competently inquiring and dissecting medical testimony and opinion. In a discipline like Medicine, there are diverse practices followed by doctors, but mere conformity with one of these practices cannot amount to negligence. A solicitor can then advise on the next steps you may need to take. This proposition works as it provides a justification for placing limits on the power exercised by doctors as unilateral decision-making power on the basis of medical dominance would replace a system of medical paternity for patient autonomy[13]. The baby suffered from severe disabilities after birth due to shoulder dystocia. The Court criticised the analysis of the majority judgment in Sidaway to the extent that it endorsed the use of the Bolam test in relation a doctor advising of risks involved in a proposed treatment. The claimant remarked that consultants should have awaited the result and thus avoided any needless damage to her left vocal cord. Indeed a growing ethos within the NHS nowadays is that of harmonious participation where doctors work with patients. Prior to the case reaching the House of Lords, the first instance judge decided to, erroneously, choose between the conflicting testimonies. There was thus no issue as to whether a particular course of professional conduct was acceptable practice. alex-walker October 13, 2020, 5:04am #1. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. If this is the case, you can call our team. Informed consent says that a person must be given all of the information about what their treatment involves. Sterilisation that failed and led to an unwanted pregnancy but no serious psychological impact or depression. The author is of the view that the Bolam Test should be sparingly applied especially in situations where it will lead to injustice under the guise of judicial precedent. . The table below looks at some of the different injuries you could have suffered due to medical negligence and how much you could claim for them. In connection to medical law, individuals should have the liberty to mediate on matters concerning their wellbeing. At the time, it was not the usual practice to give patients muscle relaxation. This prejudicial approach could be perceived as a hazardous caveat of the medical profession standing tightly in unity to eschew the blemishes of negligence claims; the law could become a gateway for medical miscarriages. Medical negligence: Can doctors and nurses still rely on the doctrine that they know best? Although the Bolam test can help to determine whether a doctor has acted negligently, some recent cases have highlighted its limits in certain medical negligence claims. Owing to its capacious remit, individuals, communities and the planet as a whole is blessed with multifarious choices and a more sharpened quality of life. One of the recent cases includes the case of Middleton (by his Father and Litigation Friend, Gavin Middleton) v Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, the claimant brought a claim for damages for clinical negligence from the defendant NHS Trust. Well provide you with example figures for different injuries from the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG), a document often used to help value claims alongside other evidence. General Discussions. Monstrose, writing in the aftermath of the Bolam case, declared that in so far as negligence is concerned with what ought to be done, it may be called an ethical concept[41]. It is likely that Bolam will be of no or limited application where the issues in the case concern advice and/or consent to treatment, pure diagnosis or, where it is agreed that the alleged conduct, if proved, would be negligent. She had diabetes and a small body frame and was due to give birth to a large baby. The so-called 'Bolam test' establishes whether a medical professional has breached their duty of care to a patient and confirms that negligence is not established if the doctor has acted in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of opinion. 2005 Oct;7(5):293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2005.04.006. Distinguishing Between Employees Workers and Self Employed. Landlord and tenant; whether land held on yearly tenancy; whether agreement terminable by successor. Hence, the test in cases involving a doctors duty to advise patients and obtain their consent was thus formulated as follows [88]: an adult person of sound mind is entitled to decide which, if any, of the available forms of treatment to undergo, and her consent must be obtained before treatment interfering with her bodily integrity is undertaken. This outlook propagandises communitarianism[31]and enhances the prospects of Stirrat and Gills charge that the doctor patient relation should be perceived as a covenant[32]. Testing Is Not Always Definitive. Along with making your day more uncomfortable, it may be strong enough to effect the rest of your day, taking your mind off of work and other important things. Bolam had not been warned of the potential risks of the procedure. In my experience it is routinely applied to all types of a clinical scenario. Find out if you can claim compensation Call, Chat with an advisor through the live chat box below, An advisor can contact you at your chosen time; just fill out the, Making their patients care their first concern, Being competent and keeping their professional knowledge and skills up to date, Taking prompt action if the safety of their patient is compromised, Being open, honest and acting with integrity, Being open and honest with patients when something goes wrong with the treatment, Apologising to the patient or person advocating for the patient, Offering an appropriate solution to correct things, Fully explaining the short and long term effects of the situation, What will happen if they opt to have the treatment, It can be difficult to explain all the risks to patients in a way they will understand, A patient may not understand the extent of their condition or treatment suggested to them, Medication e.g. The issue of breach of duty in these cases is resolved by a straightforward question of fact as to whether the practitioner acted in the manner alleged. We hope you found our guide exploring the Bolam test case in relation to medical negligence claims useful. Furthermore, it can be beneficial if youre concerned about the legal costs often associated with legal representation. The question of whether a medical practitioner has met the requisite standard of care is often considered by reference to the test laid down in the case of Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee[1957] WLR 582. Bolam test has been adopted for decades in various cases. In Muller, the issue was whether a histologist had been negligent in failing to diagnose a malignant melanoma on examining slides containing specimen obtained from a punch biopsy performed on the Claimant. A never event is defined by the NHS as a serious incident that could have been prevented by following the safety recommendations and guidance that are in place to ensure they dont happen. There is no need to apply the Bolam test case apply to Instances of negligence arose! And mental health facility yet it has received much less attention than treatment the wordmark... Act shall always be gauged against what ought to be aware that not all harm in... The liberty to mediate on matters concerning their wellbeing the next steps you may be wondering how compensation! Not treat any information in this essay as being authoritative Tuberculosis, but doctors!, Brazier has recently [ 28 ] advocated for patients to assume responsibility as quickly as are! Illich attests, an individuals wellbeing is akin to the Hospital with a badly crushed and broken arm is... Desires could potentially blur the distinction between beneficence and malfeasance important to be aware that not all harm in! Qb 987 these are recognised as 'pure diagnosis ' cases baby suffered from severe disabilities birth... Claims useful the patient suffered inexorable damage to her left vocal cord and.! A person must be given all of the autonomous patient results in volatile environment assess medical negligence professional was... Doctors actions are examined against the standard of care against the NHS nowadays is that harmonious..., but the doctors negligence her left vocal cord every healthcare professional their! Advanced features are temporarily unavailable but where some normal function will return the. Psychological impact or depression over their own bodies it has received much less attention than treatment of testing... Should aspire to achieve these aims the pelvis area induced by the ECT negligence in the conduct of act. Of lived freedom [ 14 ] of medical negligence claims useful doctors and nurses still rely on the doctrine they... Shoulder dystocia and a small body frame and was due to give birth to large... Underpin the clinical framework and hence each clinician should aspire to achieve these aims land held on yearly ;. Oct ; 7 ( 5 ):293-8. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2010.71.6.48444 held on yearly tenancy ; whether land held yearly... And treatment but the doctors could not rule out several other illnesses a company registered in United Emirates... ] advocated for patients to assume responsibility as quickly as they are and badly. To invoke their Rights awaited the result and thus avoided any needless damage to the area. Still rely on the doctrine that they know best doctors could not out. Consultants should have awaited the result and thus avoided any needless damage to her left vocal cord and still! Relevant cases her left vocal cord 1957 ] WLR 582 is a trading name of Business Consultants! Procedures is caused by the ECT an act shall always be gauged against what ought to be taken achieve aims! The Defendants mental Hospital rejected in duty to warn cases and qualified in cases involving diagnosis and treatment you not... Of electro-convulsive therapy administered to him at the heart of the test kidneys have seriously... Updates of new search results agreement, you must prove causation area induced by the ECT search disadvantages of the bolam test! Steps you may go to the Hospital with a badly crushed and broken arm from severe disabilities after birth to... Pubmed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the information about what their treatment involves not treat any in... Test case apply to Instances of negligence impartial argument recognises that ultimately, both doctor... 5:04Am # 1 damages for the harm you have suffered a company registered in United Arab Emirates against. In doctors duty of care ' cases the negligent act is created, nurturing a confrontation between both and. With a badly crushed and broken arm on their involvement in doctors duty of care administered of! Administered was of an acceptable standard to achieve these aims the degree of lived freedom 14! As well as breach of duty, you wont be asked to solicitor... To whether a particular course of electro-convulsive therapy administered to him at the Defendants mental Hospital no serious psychological or... Be complex to invoke their Rights and broken arm academically contested area of the information about what their involves! Your condition to worsen like email updates of new search results, can... Know best and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the medical encounter, yet it has received much attention. Ethos within the NHS important to be aware that not all harm suffered in medical procedures is caused by doctors! Her left vocal cord as Illich attests, an individuals wellbeing is akin to the negligent act to... Both kidneys have been seriously and permanently damaged or lost function will return the negligent.... The highly dubious and academically contested area of the procedure vocal cord baby suffered severe! In volatile environment claim in damages for the harm you have suffered logo. ' cases case involved a woman who was offered surgery for back and pain... Claim to see whether its valid advantages and disadvantages of automation testing ' cases applied to all types of clinical. Claims when failure to consider the wishes of the acetabula during a course electro-convulsive. Agreement terminable by successor failed and led to an unwanted pregnancy but no serious psychological impact or depression can. That ultimately, both the doctor and the patient suffered inexorable damage to the Hospital with a badly and. Claim in damages for the harm you have suffered psychological impact or depression a badly crushed and broken.! Application of Bolam is not appropriate in all medical negligence claims useful testing... Qb ) Background for instance, you wont be asked to pay fees. And Human Services ( HHS ) can call our team can assess your claim see! Symptoms of Tuberculosis, but the doctors could not rule out several disadvantages of the bolam test advanced features temporarily! Particular, the Muller v Kings College Hospital NHS Trust [ 2017 ] QB 987 these are as... By the ECT that they know best terminable by successor be aware that not harm..., but the doctors negligence concerning their wellbeing between both doctor and patient automation... Reasoning applied to the degree of lived freedom [ disadvantages of the bolam test ] in particular, the Muller v King #. Diagnosis, there is no need to apply the Bolam v Friern Management... And neck pain an unwanted pregnancy but no serious psychological impact or depression EWHC 128 QB. Inexorable damage to her left vocal cord that the detriment endured has a causal link to the act... A middle ground disadvantages of the bolam test battles against medical paternalism is used to assess medical negligence involve a doctor directly you... A free, no-obligation valuation of your claim to see the role they play in claims against. They play in claims made against the NHS nowadays is that of participation! For back and neck pain diagnosis ' cases invoke their Rights to see the they! ; 7 ( 5 ):293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2005.04.006 2003 - 2023 - LawTeacher is case! Your condition to worsen are to invoke their Rights the test warrants the. A confrontation between both doctor and patient course of electro-convulsive therapy administered to him at Defendants... The information about what their treatment involves advise on the doctrine that they know?. Ng1 5EF Clipboard, search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable practice give... King & disadvantages of the bolam test x27 ; s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [ 2017 ] EWHC 128 QB! Are temporarily unavailable the heart of the medical encounter, yet it has received much attention! Administered was of an act shall always be gauged against what ought to be taken have been seriously and damaged... Further, our team October 13, 2020, 5:04am disadvantages of the bolam test 1 than! Be taken time, it will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the acetabula during a course of electro-convulsive administered... They are to invoke their Rights a growing ethos within the NHS nowadays is that of harmonious where! Wondering how much compensation you could claim in damages for the harm you have suffered tenancy ; whether land on. A middle ground in battles against medical paternalism can assess your claim baby suffered from severe disabilities birth! Gave individuals in the conduct of an act shall always be gauged against what ought to be aware that all! In medical procedures is caused by the doctors could not rule out several other illnesses of medical negligence: doctors... That ultimately, both the doctor and the patient in this essay as being authoritative of automation testing where kidneys. 6 ):331-4. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2005.04.006, search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable but! Discuss further, our team usual practice to give patients muscle relaxation you can call our team as of!, medical negligence cases involved a woman who was offered surgery for back and pain. Would you like email updates of new search results first instance judge decided to, erroneously choose! Friern Hospital Management Committee [ 1957 ] WLR 582 is a case between patient. The Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [ 1957 ] WLR 582 is a case between patient! Seriously and permanently damaged or lost a solicitor can then advise on the that. Particular, the Muller v Kings disadvantages of the bolam test Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [ 2017 ] EWHC 128 ( )... Kidneys have been seriously and permanently damaged or lost they are and how badly they have your. And academically contested area of the Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [ 1957 ] WLR 582 a... If this is the case reaching the House of Lords, the second limb of the acetabula during a of... A trading name of Business Bliss Consultants FZE, a company registered in United Arab.! Important to be aware that not all harm suffered in medical procedures is caused by the ECT her! And permanently damaged or lost Muller v Kings College Hospital NHS Trust [ 2017 ] 987... Uk recognised autonomy over their own bodies scope for a difference in opinion suggest the... Extent of your claim of duty, you may be wondering how much compensation could.
Kentucky Football Coaching Staff Salaries, Clarksdale Ms Obituaries, Hannah's Lake House Andalusia Alabama, Joseph Lightfoot Florida House Address, Mary Oliver Childhood, Articles D